Skip to content

[INT-78] visual-snapshots: parallel processing of PDF pages #205

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Mar 20, 2025

Conversation

perf2711
Copy link
Contributor

@perf2711 perf2711 commented Mar 13, 2025

visual-snapshots: parallel processing of PDF pages

Issue: INT-78

Description

Adds parallel processing of PDF pages using the workerpool library.

Types of Changes

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

@perf2711 perf2711 added enhancement New feature or request javascript Pull requests that update Javascript code labels Mar 13, 2025
@perf2711 perf2711 force-pushed the feat/INT-78/pdf-parallel-processing branch from 6b68d3a to 1287e73 Compare March 14, 2025 16:03
@perf2711 perf2711 self-assigned this Mar 18, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@paweltomaszewskisaucelabs paweltomaszewskisaucelabs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Incredible performance improvement!
Great work, I can't wait to play with it in examples repo.

Base automatically changed from feat/INT-1/jest-esm to feat/INT-1/pdf-snapshots March 20, 2025 14:13
@perf2711 perf2711 force-pushed the feat/INT-78/pdf-parallel-processing branch from 8f6f09d to 57975c2 Compare March 20, 2025 14:13
@perf2711 perf2711 merged commit 65cddbb into feat/INT-1/pdf-snapshots Mar 20, 2025
1 check passed
@perf2711 perf2711 deleted the feat/INT-78/pdf-parallel-processing branch March 20, 2025 14:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request javascript Pull requests that update Javascript code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants